News

ADR regulatory process update

On 17 October 2023, the Commission adopted a proposal for a directive amending Directive 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes, as well as Directives (EU) 2015/2302, (EU) 2019/2161 and (EU) 2020/1828.

The proposal entails several key changes:

  • It extends consumer rights to non-contractual and pre-contractual situations, including digital content and services, and allows for additional dispute resolution categories. It removes geographical establishment requirements for traders, defining cross-border disputes between consumers and traders in different EU states.
  • The changes allow bundling similar cases into one procedure with consumer consent, impose a 20-day response deadline for traders to ADR requests, and permit Member States to mandate trader participation in ADR.
  • It ensures complaint traceability and support for vulnerable consumers, including non-digital procedures upon request. Parties have the right to human review of automated ADR processes.
  • Improved information access and assistance for cross-border disputes are mandated, with ADR contact points designated by Member States.

To enhance trader participation, amendments proposed by the IMCO Committee make participation mandatory for certain air carriers and extend the scope to include pre-contractual obligations.

To boost consumer awareness, amendments aim to improve the impartiality and quality of ADR procedures, requiring human review of automated processes and general understanding of private law in cross-border cases by ADR personnel.

On 13 March, the Plenary endorsed the report as Parliament first reading position with 605 votes in favour, 7 votes against and 13 abstentions. In the Council, it has been referred to the Working Party on Consumer Protection and Information, which debated it for the last time on 22 April.

It is uncertain whether the ADR will be adopted before the European Parliament elections in June. Any institutional change in the midst of this process could influence the regulatory process and final result of the file.

Share this page

News

OPEN DECLARATION CALLING FOR FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO GUIDE INTERPRETATION OF THE PRODUCT LIABILITY DIRECTIVE

EJF has joined a coalition of organisations (the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, MedTech Europe, CEFIC, the Digital Poland Association, Danish Industry and EFPIA calling on the European Commission to issue Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to guide implementation of the revised Product Liability Directive (PLD) ahead of its January 2027 application deadline.

read more

News

Press Release: Liability Frameworks in the Life Sciences Sector and their Implications for the EU Single Market

On Tuesday, 9 June 2026, the European Justice Forum in partnership with European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) and MEDTECH Europe, organised a working lunch titled "Liability Frameworks in the Life Sciences Sector and their Implications for the EU Single Market", hosted by MEP Adam Jarubas, Chair of the SANT Committee and co-hosted by MEP Anna Zalewska, European Conservatives and Reformists, MEP Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Socialists and Democrats, in the European Parliament, in Brussels.

read more

News

PRESS RELEASE: Consumer Protection and Product Liability 
Challenges in the EU - Lessons to be Learnt from the Nordics

On Monday, 8 June 2026, the European Justice Forum organised a roundtable titled "Consumer Protection and Product Liability Challenges in the EU - Lessons to be Learnt from the Nordics", held at Avenue des Arts 6-9, Brussels.

read more

News

Amendment to product liability law met with mixed reactions

Berlin: The draft bill presented by the Federal Government “on the modernisation of product liability law” has received mixed reviews from experts. At a public hearing of the Committee on Law and Consumer Protection on Monday, the planned 1:1 implementation of a corresponding EU directive was criticised by some as going too far and by others as being too unambitious.

read more